What the agreement a player accepts actually says

The Terms of Use on Pulsz's own website is the contract a player accepts at registration. Read on its own, it describes an entertainment product and nothing else.

In capital letters it states: "THIS SITE AND THE SERVICES PROVIDED HEREIN DO NOT OFFER REAL MONEY GAMBLING. NO PURCHASE OR PAYMENT IS NECESSARY TO ENTER OR WIN ON PULSZ. A PURCHASE OR PAYMENT OF ANY KIND WILL NOT INCREASE YOUR CHANCE OF WINNING." It adds that the service "IS INTENDED FOR ENTERTAINMENT PURPOSES ONLY" and is "VOID WHERE PROHIBITED."

That is the company's own account of what it sells: a free game, where paying changes nothing. It is worth holding in mind while reading the next section.

What the platform actually does with the money

Pulsz sells coin packages for real dollars and runs slot and bingo games on them. Players redeem what they win.

The structure is the one used across this industry. There are two currencies. One is bought with real money and can never be cashed out. The other arrives free alongside a purchase and can be redeemed for cash once it has been played through. Neither currency, described on its own, looks like gambling. That is the design.

What a player experiences is simpler than the structure: money goes in, a casino game is played, and money sometimes comes back out. We are investigating whether the second description is the accurate one.

Where you are allowed to play, and where you are not

The terms bar access from Washington, Idaho, Michigan, Montana, Nevada, Alabama, Tennessee, Connecticut, New York, West Virginia, Louisiana, Maryland, California and Arizona. Promotions are additionally limited for players in Mississippi, New Jersey, Indiana, Maine and Oklahoma.

Fourteen blocked states is a long list by the standards of this industry — some competitors block only six or seven. That is worth a player's attention for a practical reason. Operators here tend to withdraw from exactly the states whose laws are least comfortable for them. Where a company has chosen not to operate is often a better guide to the legal risk it perceives than anything in its marketing.

Why we believe this is unlawful, and what you may be able to recover

Most states draw a line between a game played for amusement and gambling played for money, and they license the second. A platform that takes real dollars, runs casino games on them and pays cash out is, on the face of it, doing the second thing. We believe it is illegal gambling, and that in most states a player who lost money is entitled to recover it.

Three separate claims follow, and they do not depend on each other.

The first is loss recovery. Many states let a person recover money lost to gambling that was never licensed or authorized where they live. Depending on the state, that can mean the full amount lost, and some states allow more than the amount lost.

The second is deception. We believe that building a two-currency structure for the purpose of not having to call the product gambling is itself unfair and deceptive under most states' consumer protection laws. The structure is not incidental — it is the point. It is what allows a casino to tell a player, in writing and in capital letters, that it is not a casino, and it works: players believe it, which is why they play.

The third concerns cancellation. Where a player tried to stop recurring charges and found it difficult, or was charged after trying to cancel, that can be a claim in its own right — one that does not turn on the gambling question at all. We ask about it because players often do not realize it is separate.

Which of these is available to you, and what it is worth, depends on your state. That is not a hedge. It is the actual shape of this area of law, and it is the first thing we check.

What Maginnis Howard is doing about it

We are investigating how Pulsz sells and markets its coin packages, what it tells players about whether the games are legal, how it handles cancellations and redemptions, and what players have lost.

If you bought Pulsz coins with real money and lost more than you ever redeemed, we would like to hear from you. What helps most is the email address on your account and your best estimate of what you paid in and what you got back; we confirm your state with you when we review your claim. If you also had trouble cancelling a recurring charge, tell us that too.

You do not need purchase records to talk to us — obtaining them is part of what we do. There is no cost to have your situation reviewed, and no fee unless we recover money for you.

Think you're affected? Check if you qualify and sign up in about two minutes — no upfront cost.

Check if you qualify

Frequently asked questions

What is this investigation about?

Pulsz sells coin packages for real money and lets players redeem winnings for cash prizes. We are investigating whether that is unlicensed online casino gambling in states that never authorized it, and whether the way it is marketed misleads players about its legality.

Pulsz says it is not real money gambling. Doesn't that settle it?

No. A company's description of its own product does not decide whether a law applies to it. Most states ask what the business actually does — whether a player risks money on a game of chance for the possibility of winning something of value. We believe the sweepstakes label is a structure built to avoid that conclusion, not a reason it does not apply.

I never won anything. Do I still have a claim?

Possibly, and in many states that is the stronger position. Loss recovery is about what you lost, not what you won. Tell us what you paid in.

What if I had trouble cancelling or stopping charges?

Tell us. Difficulty cancelling a recurring charge, or being charged after you tried to stop, can be a separate claim in its own right, independent of the gambling question. It is one of the things we ask about.

Is my state covered?

That depends. Pulsz does not operate in every state, and the states that allow recovery of gambling losses are not the same list. We confirm your state with you as the first step of reviewing your claim.

What does this cost me?

Nothing to have your situation reviewed, and no fee unless we recover money for you.

What clients say

The entire process with Maginnis Howard was effortless. All our communication was by email and only a few phone calls. Any calls or emails were answered very promptly. I would like to thank Ian and Maginnis Howard. I will highly recommend any dispute that includes an Arbitration Agreement, there could no be a better Firm to represent you!
— Daniel B.
Ian is an excellent communicator who knows how to work with these companies to obtain a resolution and get you the best settlement offer possible. I highly recommend Ian and the Maginnis Howard law firm for anyone navigating the arbitration process.
— Cheille H.
I'm very grateful for his representation and the result we achieved. If you're facing arbitration and feel overwhelmed or unsure of your rights, I highly recommend Ian Vance and Maginnis Howard. They know how to handle these cases and fight for their clients.
— Ryan Z.

unlawfulcharges.com is operated by Maginnis Howard, a consumer-protection law firm.